Useful EA publishes this comparison, Useful EA is one of the products included below, and Useful EA is operated by Nick Malik through CTO Resources LLC. We have an obvious interest in how it's presented here — read our own entry with that in mind.
Pricing, edition names and plan limits were checked directly against each vendor's own website on October 1, 2026. Vendors change pricing and packaging without notice, so confirm current details on the linked pages before you rely on anything here for a purchase decision. Where we call a tool “best suited to” something, that's our judgment as a vendor in this space — not an independent or third-party ranking, and not a rating, award or endorsement of any kind.
Fifteen tools have at least one edition under US$395 per seat per year that's relevant to business architecture. None is strong at all five practitioner jobs. Useful EA, Turbo EA, Sparx Enterprise Architect, Essential Open Source, OpenEA Community and Vertaxa cover the broadest mix; Jibility Basic is strongest for capability-to-roadmap planning; APM+ for a focused application portfolio; Vindaris for strategic-alignment and demand work without a capability repository. Structured tools (which treat capabilities, applications and initiatives as reusable, governed data) are a different category from diagramming and presentation tools (which draw the same concepts as unconnected shapes and slides) — both are covered below, kept clearly separate. One product, Wovex, has publicly conflicting pricing we could not resolve and is flagged as qualification-pending rather than listed as qualifying.
What counts as “low-cost” here
To qualify, a tool needed at least one usable edition costing less than US$395 per paid seat per year: a subscription under that amount, a perpetual license that starts under that amount, a source-available/open-source edition, or a free tier or edition. The cutoff applies to a specific edition, not to a vendor's whole product line — we name the exact qualifying edition for each tool rather than describing the product family in general terms, since pricing often varies enormously between a vendor's cheapest and most expensive tiers.
A low sticker price doesn't mean a low total cost. Several tools below are free or inexpensive to license but require you to provide your own hosting, security, backups and upgrades if self-hosted, or to budget separately for implementation, data migration, training and ongoing support regardless of deployment model. We call that out per product, but plan for it no matter which tool you choose.
Structured tools vs. diagramming tools
“Business architecture tool” gets used loosely enough to cover two genuinely different kinds of software, and readers evaluating options benefit from keeping them separate:
- Structured business-architecture tools treat capabilities, applications, strategies, initiatives, benefits and the relationships between them as reusable information objects stored in a repository. Updating one object — a capability's maturity score, an application's owner — can affect every view, analysis or report that references it.
- Diagramming and presentation tools can absolutely depict a capability map, a benefit dependency network or an application landscape — but the boxes and connectors are generally drawing objects on a canvas or slide, not governed data. Two diagrams showing the same capability twice don't know they're the same capability; there's usually no native assessment, portfolio calculation, relationship analysis or automatic propagation across views.
Neither category is objectively better. A diagramming tool is often the right choice for a one-off workshop or a polished stakeholder deck; a structured repository earns its keep when the same capability, application or initiative needs to show up correctly in five different analyses six months later without being re-entered. This page covers both, in clearly separate sections, because they compete for the same low-cost budget line even though they solve different problems.
Key terms, defined
- Business architecture software
- Tooling used to model, analyze and govern an organization's capabilities, applications, strategies, initiatives and the relationships among them — as distinct from general-purpose diagramming software that can draw the same concepts without maintaining them as connected data.
- Capability modeling
- Representing what an organization does (as opposed to how it's organized or what systems it runs) as structured capability objects, usually in a hierarchy, with current/target maturity assessments, heatmaps and relationships to strategy, applications or initiatives.
- Benefit dependency network (BDN) modeling
- Modeling the causal chain from strategic objectives through intended benefits, business changes, enabling changes, and the initiatives, systems or technologies that deliver them — making it possible to trace why a given piece of work is being funded.
- Application portfolio management (APM)
- Maintaining a structured inventory of applications linked to the capabilities they support, their owners, lifecycle status, technical fitness, cost and dependencies, so portfolio-level decisions (retire, replace, consolidate) can be made with evidence.
- Demand management
- Capturing, assessing, prioritizing and governing proposed initiatives, change requests or work demand before it becomes funded delivery. This is about organizational change demand, not employee staffing/workforce-demand forecasting.
- Strategic alignment
- Maintaining traceable relationships from goals and objectives down to the capabilities, initiatives, applications or delivery work that are supposed to realize them, so alignment can be checked rather than assumed.
The comparison at a glance
← Scroll to see more columns →
| Product / edition | Qualifying price | Capability modeling | BDN modeling | APM | Demand management | Strategic alignment | Best suited to |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Useful EA | $18/mo or $180/yr per seat | Strong — 5-level hierarchy | Strong — dedicated tool | Strong | Partial | Strong | Capability assessment into a fundable, traceable portfolio |
| Jibility Basic | Free (1 roadmap, 20 initiatives) | Strong | Partial | No evidence | Strong within one roadmap | Strong | One capability-based strategic roadmap |
| Turbo EA | Free — self-hosted | Strong | Partial | Strong | Strong | Strong | Broad self-hosted coverage without seat fees |
| Albumi | Free ≤3; Team $150/seat/yr* | Strong | No evidence | Strong | Strong — change requests | Partial–Strong | Small team, applications/integration/governance |
| Sparx Enterprise Architect | $245 / $320 one-time | Strong via modeling | Partial — custom-built | Partial–Strong | Partial | Strong | Deep, standards-based modeling breadth |
| Essential Open Source | Free — self-hosted | Strong | No dedicated BDN | Strong | Partial | Strong | Repository-driven BA/APM without license fees |
| ADOIT Community | Free — hosted | Strong via ArchiMate | No dedicated BDN | Partial–Strong | Partial | Strong | Hosted formal BA starting point, no self-hosting |
| OpenEA Community | Free — self-hosted | Strong | No dedicated BDN | Strong | Partial | Strong | Governed repository, explainable impact analysis |
| Archi | Free / open source | Strong via ArchiMate | Partial — manual | Partial — manual | No evidence | Strong via motivation elements | Free formal ArchiMate modeling |
| Archipeg | Free — 1 user/1 project | Strong | No evidence | Partial | Partial | Strong | Individual, flexible browser modeling |
| Vertaxa | A$40/user/mo** | Strong | No evidence | Strong | Partial | Strong | Connected repository with client-ready exports |
* Albumi's Team plan is a $1,500/year minimum for up to 10 members ($150/seat only if all 10 are used); Business is $5,000/year for up to 30 ($166.67/seat at full capacity). ** Vertaxa's price is carried over from vendor materials and could not be independently reconfirmed by us (its pricing page is JavaScript-rendered and didn't return pricing text to our fetch tooling) — see its profile below before relying on this figure. None of these prices include hosting, implementation, data migration, training or ongoing support — budget for those separately, especially for the self-hosted, free options.
Structured tool profiles
Detailed profiles for every tool in the table above, in the same order.
Useful EA
Jobs: Capability modeling (strong) · BDN (strong) · APM (strong) · Demand management (partial) · Strategic alignment (strong)
- Price: $18/month or $180/year for an individual seat; $100/month for up to 25 seats under a Corporate plan (billed monthly, so a $100/month minimum regardless of how many of the 25 seats are active). A custom annual Corporate agreement is also available at a price that isn't published.
- Capabilities: capability hierarchies up to five levels with current/target maturity scoring across people, process, tools and information; strategic linkage and priority scoring; proposed programs and OKRs; an Application Portfolio Manager that maps applications to capabilities and traces data flows; a dedicated Benefit Dependency Network tool with configurable columns and classic BDN vocabulary, which flags items lacking upstream strategic alignment; and PowerPoint/image/CSV export throughout.
Best suited to: moving a capability assessment into a prioritized, traceable, fundable portfolio, with editable stakeholder deliverables, without first building a full enterprise repository.
Key limitations: it's a suite of focused, separate tools rather than one unified governed repository, and it doesn't provide a dedicated demand-intake/governance workflow — prioritization and proposed programs support that job partially, not fully.
Jibility Basic
Jobs: Capability modeling (strong) · BDN (partial) · APM (no evidence) · Demand management (strong, within one roadmap) · Strategic alignment (strong)
- Price: Basic is free for one roadmap with up to 20 initiatives. Professional is $39/user/month billed annually ($468/year) or $59/month billed monthly — both exceed the $395 cutoff, so only Basic qualifies here.
- Capabilities: objective-based and capability-based planning methods; capability assessment and heatmaps; strategic challenges, actions and initiatives; roadmap construction; view-only sharing; a reference library. Professional adds unlimited roadmaps/initiatives, exports, a customizable prioritization matrix and advanced cost/benefit estimation.
Best suited to: an individual architect or strategist building one capability-based strategic roadmap from strategy through to prioritized initiatives.
Key limitations: the free tier's one-roadmap/20-initiative limit is significant for ongoing use; it isn't an application portfolio repository or a dedicated BDN platform.
Turbo EA
Jobs: Capability modeling (strong) · BDN (partial) · APM (strong) · Demand management (strong) · Strategic alignment (strong)
- Price: no per-seat fee, unlimited users. Self-hosted via a two-container Docker deployment requiring PostgreSQL; hosting, infrastructure and any optional paid services are extra.
- Capabilities: capability hierarchy and heatmaps; value streams and organization modeling; application, data and technology catalogs; strategy, objectives and initiatives; project/portfolio management and governance; dependency, lifecycle, cost, matrix and data-quality reports; REST API and Excel/CSV interchange.
- License: Functional Source License (FSL-1.1-MIT) — source-available, not an OSI-approved open-source license, though it converts to plain MIT terms after the license's change date.
Best suited to: a technically capable team wanting broad business/enterprise architecture coverage and initiative management without seat fees.
Key limitations: you own the operational burden — hosting, security, backups and upgrades; it's a newer project than the established desktop tools.
Albumi
Jobs: Capability modeling (strong) · BDN (no evidence) · APM (strong) · Demand management (strong, change requests/initiatives) · Strategic alignment (partial–strong)
- Price: free for up to 3 members. Team: $1,500/year for up to 10 members — a $1,500/year minimum regardless of seats used, or $150/seat/year if all 10 are active. Business: $5,000/year for up to 30 members — a $5,000/year minimum, or about $166.67/seat/year at full capacity.
- Capabilities: multilevel capabilities with application mapping; application portfolio and TIME analysis; technology stacks; integrations and data lineage; initiatives; architecture change requests; review boards; diagrams; audit trails.
Best suited to: a small, collaborative business/enterprise architecture team emphasizing application, integration and governance work.
Key limitations: meaningful minimum spend below the seat cap; per-seat economics only look attractive if all bundled seats are used; no dedicated benefit dependency network; a newer SaaS vendor worth reviewing for security, continuity and export before committing.
Sparx Enterprise Architect
Jobs: Capability modeling (strong, via modeling) · BDN (partial, custom-built) · APM (partial–strong) · Demand management (partial) · Strategic alignment (strong)
- Price: Professional edition, fixed/named-user license, $245 one-time; Corporate edition, fixed/named-user license, $320 one-time. Optional annual maintenance renewals were $81 (Professional) and $106 (Corporate). Floating licenses and the Unified/Ultimate editions cost substantially more and don't qualify.
- Capabilities: ArchiMate, UML, BPMN, requirements management, traceability, roadmaps, matrices, documentation generation and shared repositories. Corporate adds database-backed repositories, role-based security, auditing and baseline-merge tooling.
Best suited to: experienced modelers who need broad business, enterprise, solution and technical modeling depth in one desktop tool.
Key limitations: desktop-centered and dense, with a real learning curve; capability modeling, APM, BDN and demand-management practices all require modeling configuration rather than a focused, purpose-built workflow; browser-based collaboration can require additional products.
Essential Open Source
Jobs: Capability modeling (strong) · BDN (no dedicated workflow) · APM (strong) · Demand management (partial) · Strategic alignment (strong)
- Price: free, self-hosted, GPL license.
- Capabilities: a connected ontology spanning business capabilities, processes, value streams, applications, technologies, strategy and projects, with generated visualizations and Excel import.
Best suited to: teams that want repository-driven business architecture and application-portfolio views without license fees.
Key limitations: self-administration and community support; simpler capture than the commercial Essential product line; no REST API in the open-source edition; no dedicated BDN workflow.
ADOIT Community Edition
Jobs: Capability modeling (strong, via ArchiMate) · BDN (no dedicated workflow) · APM (partial–strong) · Demand management (partial) · Strategic alignment (strong)
- Price: free, hosted community edition, 100% browser-based.
- Capabilities: ArchiMate 3.1 and a simplified “ArchiMate Lite” mode; graphical and tabular modeling; reports, dashboards and queries; application/technology roadmaps; lifecycle/risk views; imports/exports; REST APIs.
Best suited to: individuals or small practices starting formal business architecture work without self-hosting.
Key limitations: public community-edition limits aren't entirely clear; commercial ADOIT's fuller feature set shouldn't be assumed to carry over; no dedicated BDN workflow.
OpenEA Community
Jobs: Capability modeling (strong) · BDN (no dedicated workflow) · APM (strong) · Demand management (partial) · Strategic alignment (strong)
- Price: free, self-hosted, GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 (AGPLv3).
- Capabilities: capabilities, processes, organizations, roles, applications/services, data, technology, initiatives, principles and architecture decisions; recursive impact analysis; findings; application and technology portfolio views; derived roadmaps; review cycles; CSV import/export; a REST API.
Best suited to: teams wanting a governed repository and explainable relationship/impact analysis, comfortable self-hosting.
Key limitations: a newer project with a limited adoption history; self-hosting burden; no free-form diagramming or dedicated BDN.
Archi
Jobs: Capability modeling (strong via ArchiMate) · BDN (partial, manual) · APM (partial, manual) · Demand management (no evidence) · Strategic alignment (strong, via motivation elements)
- Price: free and open source (MIT-type license).
- Capabilities: ArchiMate 3.2 modeling — including capability, strategy/motivation, application and relationship modeling; runs on Windows, macOS and Linux; the ArchiMate Exchange Format; canvas and sketch views; Git-based collaboration through the coArchi plugin.
Best suited to: ArchiMate practitioners who need formal, standards-based models at no cost.
Key limitations: not a purpose-built demand-management, benefits-realization or APM workflow — those concepts can be modeled in ArchiMate but aren't dedicated product functions; repository analytics and governance are limited; collaboration is Git-oriented and support is community-based.
Archipeg
Jobs: Capability modeling (strong) · BDN (no evidence) · APM (partial) · Demand management (partial) · Strategic alignment (strong)
- Price: free for one user and one project. Paid usage is calculated live on Archipeg's own pricing calculator based on users and projects — we can't publish a single reliable qualifying figure, so check the live calculator for your intended usage before budgeting.
- Capabilities: an object catalog, flexible user-defined metamodels, data-driven diagrams, graph exploration, TOGAF/C4/DDD use cases, capability alignment, and technology investment/retirement analysis.
Best suited to: an individual business or solution architect who wants flexible, browser-based modeling rather than a fixed notation.
Key limitations: only one project is free; paid pricing scales with usage rather than a flat seat price; no documented dedicated BDN; maturity, support and security should be evaluated before committing budget.
Vertaxa
Jobs: Capability modeling (strong) · BDN (no evidence) · APM (strong) · Demand management (partial) · Strategic alignment (strong)
Vertaxa's pricing page renders its prices via JavaScript, and our automated page-fetching tools could not retrieve the pricing text through it — only the page's title loaded. The figure below (A$40/user/month, or A$480/year) is carried over from prior research material we could not re-verify ourselves. Check vertaxa.online directly before relying on this number.
If accurate, A$480/year converts to approximately US$336 at the AUD/USD spot rate on October 1, 2026 (about 0.6994 USD per AUD) — under the $395 cutoff. That conversion moves with the exchange rate: at the rate needed to just clear $395 (about 0.823 USD per AUD), the same A$480/year figure would stop qualifying. Recalculate against the current rate and the vendor's current price before treating this as qualifying.
- Capabilities (per vendor materials): a connected model spanning strategy, business capabilities, applications, technology and data; PowerPoint, draw.io, image and ArchiMate exports; Excel round-trip; baselines and audit history; AI-assisted options.
Best suited to: solo consultants and small in-house architecture teams wanting current, client-ready output from one connected repository — if the price checks out.
Key limitations: a recent product with limited public evidence of scale or adoption; foreign-exchange qualification risk as described above; no documented BDN or mature demand-management workflow.
Focused specialist tools
These four aren't broad business-architecture platforms — each does one job well and leaves the rest thin or absent. Worth knowing about for that one job specifically.
APM+
Job: Application portfolio management (strong) — the only one of the five this tool targets
- Price: free for up to 25 applications, unlimited users, no credit card required. Paid tiers (Starter, 100 applications; Professional, 250–1,000) run $160–$400/month depending on application count — well above our per-seat framing once translated to a meaningful team, so we're treating the free edition as the defensible qualifier, per the free tier's own generous unlimited-user allowance.
- Capabilities: structured applications with owners, costs, hosting, lifecycle and capability links; dependency mapping; TIME scoring; heatmaps; roadmaps; rationalization workflows; spreadsheet import; owner attestation.
Best suited to: a small application portfolio, or a pilot, tied to business capabilities.
Key limitations: a focused APM tool, not a broader business-architecture platform; no BDN; the free tier caps out at 25 applications.
Wovex Qualification pending
Job: Benefit dependency network modeling (strong, if the price qualifies) — not included in the main comparison table above because its qualifying price is unresolved
Wovex's own self-serve pricing page, fetched directly on October 1, 2026, shows a Starter plan at £9.49/user/month billed annually (£11.59 billed monthly) and an Advanced plan at £20.99/user/month billed annually (£25.69 billed monthly) — both of which would comfortably clear the $395/year cutoff.
But third-party and procurement-marketplace listings describe a different structure: a “Starter (Team)” plan at £149/month for 3 users (≈£49.67/user/month) and an “Advanced (Team)” plan at £249/month for 3 users (≈£83/user/month), reported via G2's Wovex listing and a UK Government Digital Marketplace G-Cloud pricing document — typically sourced from a vendor's own submitted price schedule. At £49.67/user/month, the annualized cost (≈£596/user/year, roughly US$800 at current exchange rates) would not qualify.
We could not determine which figure applies to a given purchase path (self-serve signup vs. a team/ procurement quote), so Wovex is not counted as qualifying in this comparison. Contact Wovex directly and get a current, written quote before assuming either price applies to you.
- Capabilities: purpose-built benefit dependency maps; structured benefits, measures, goals, objectives, initiatives, assumptions and deliverables; strategic paths; map views; comments; value agreements; benefit tracking, calculations and portfolio optimization on higher plans.
Best suited to (capability fit only, not a pricing endorsement): formal benefits realization and tracing initiatives back to outcomes and strategic goals.
Key limitations: pricing status unresolved, as above; no capability repository or APM; capability modeling is add-on/partial rather than a core function.
Vindaris
Jobs: Demand management (strong) · Strategic alignment (strong) · no capability repository, BDN tool or APM
- Price: free for up to 5 members; Connect €10/user/month; Pro €20/user/month (unlimited users per organization) — all well under the cutoff even before any annual-billing discount. The vendor mentions an annual discount (“2 months free”) without listing the exact annual figure.
- Capabilities: structured goals, priorities and work items; an alignment canvas/map; heatmaps; task boards; risk summaries; integrations.
Best suited to: strategy execution, prioritization and alignment of active work — as an adjacent tool, not a complete business-architecture platform.
Key limitations: not a capability repository, BDN tool or APM product; include it for demand/alignment work specifically, not as a substitute for the structured tools above.
Modelio Open Source
Jobs: Capability modeling (strong via ArchiMate) · general UML/BPMN/ArchiMate modeling, not a focused BA workflow
- Price: free and open source, GPL license.
- Capabilities: UML, BPMN and ArchiMate modeling with extensibility, visual queries and publishing.
Best suited to: technical or business modelers who want several formal notations in one free tool.
Key limitations: general-purpose modeling rather than a focused business-architecture workflow; commercial teamwork features and some EA-specific modules may be separate products — we couldn't fully confirm which capabilities are open-source-only vs. paid add-ons, so verify directly with the vendor.
Diagramming and presentation tools
These seven can draw a capability map, a BDN or an application landscape, and several are genuinely good at it — but per the distinction above, their shapes are drawing objects, not governed architecture data. Presented as a table, not full profiles, since the “why it's not equivalent” reasoning is the same for most of them.
| Product | Current low-cost option | Useful for | Why it isn't equivalent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Miro | Free (3 editable boards); Starter $8/member/month billed annually | Workshops, collaborative maps, canvases and voting | Board shapes and content, not an EA semantic repository |
| Creately | Free (unlimited canvases/collaborators, 45 items/canvas); paid Starter price wasn't shown on the live page — confirm before budgeting | Collaborative diagrams, templates, some database-backed canvases | Flexible visual workspace, not a purpose-built governed BA metamodel/workflow |
| diagrams.net / draw.io | Free, no sign-up required; Apache 2.0 | Private/local diagrams and easy sharing | Diagram files and shapes; no native capability/APM/benefit repository |
| EdrawMax | $99/year (promotional, from $119); $198 perpetual (promotional, from $245) | General business diagrams and templates | Drawing/presentation tool, no architecture governance or portfolio analysis |
| Collidu | $99.99/year individual (per vendor materials; live pricing page returned a 403 to our fetch tooling — confirm directly) | Downloadable editable PowerPoint/Google Slides templates | Template library, not modeling software; each slide is independent artwork |
| SketchBubble | Free templates; AI-only $15/month; Pro $50/month | PowerPoint/Google Slides/Keynote templates and AI-assisted presentations | Template/presentation service, not an architecture repository |
| Lucidchart | Free edition exists; paid price requires an account/live-page check — not retrievable via our automated tooling | Collaborative diagrams and data-assisted visuals | Primarily diagramming; no dedicated business-architecture repository/workflow in low-cost editions |
Collidu and SketchBubble are presentation-template libraries, not diagramming or modeling applications — grouped here because they compete for the same “quick capability map or BDN slide” budget line, not because they work the same way diagrams.net or Miro do.
Non-qualifiers and exclusions
Relevant products that fail or can't prove the price rule
- Capstera Platform — Starter is $499/month for up to 5 users (about $1,197.60 per included user/year at full use); Professional is $999/month for 25 (about $479.52/user/year). Both exceed the cutoff; confirmed directly against capstera.com/pricing on October 1, 2026. Capstera's free generators, scorecards and purchased template/content products are resources, not a qualifying platform edition.
- Trisotech Capability Modeler — relevant capability and strategic-planning functionality, but the vendor provides request-only suite pricing with no published qualifying edition. A trial isn't a qualifying edition. Source: trisotech.com/product
- IRIS Business Architect — starts at $3,495 for a single-user perpetual license (Workgroup and Enterprise tiers run substantially higher), far above the cutoff. Source: biz-architect.com/pricing
Large business/EA suites with quote-based or known high prices are outside this comparison unless a qualifying edition is publicly documented.
Relevance exclusions
- Products focused on individual employee skills or competencies (e.g. Sigma Computing's “Capability Model Tracker”) rather than organizational business capabilities — a different meaning of “capability.”
- Employee-benefits enrollment, compensation, insurance and HR-benefit administration software. “Benefits” in this comparison means organizational outcomes and value realization, not employee benefits.
- Software composition analysis, package dependency or code dependency mapping products (e.g. Mend.io). “Dependency” here means business, benefits and initiative relationships, not software-library dependencies.
Selection guidance
This is guidance, not a ranking — the right tool depends on which of the five jobs matters most to you:
- Capability assessment into a prioritized, traceable portfolio: Useful EA
- One capability-based strategic roadmap: Jibility Basic
- Broadest self-hosted coverage without seat fees: Turbo EA
- Small team, application/integration/governance focus: Albumi
- Deep, standards-based modeling breadth: Sparx Enterprise Architect
- Repository-driven BA/APM, open source: Essential Open Source or OpenEA Community
- Hosted formal ArchiMate without self-hosting: ADOIT Community Edition
- Free formal ArchiMate modeling: Archi
- Flexible individual browser modeling: Archipeg
- Focused application portfolio only: APM+
- Demand/alignment of active work, no repository needed: Vindaris
- A quick workshop diagram or stakeholder slide, not a repository: any tool in the diagramming table
Methodology and sources
Every price, edition name and capability claim in this comparison was checked directly against the linked vendor page as of October 1, 2026, rather than taken from memory or from third-party listing sites. Where a vendor's own page could not be automatically retrieved or rendered (Vertaxa's pricing, Collidu's pricing page, Lucidchart's exact paid price), we say so explicitly in the relevant section rather than publish an unconfirmed number as fact. We did not use ratings, review-site scores, market-share figures, customer counts or “most popular” claims anywhere in this comparison — that information isn't something we can independently verify, so we left it out rather than repeat unverified numbers.
Pricing and packaging change. If you find something here that's out of date, the linked vendor page is the source of truth — not this article.
Already know you need to prioritize, not just catalog
If your next step is turning a capability assessment into a ranked, defensible set of investment proposals tied to strategy — or tracing a proposed initiative back to the benefits and objectives it's supposed to serve — that's what Useful EA's Capability Modeler and Benefit Dependency Network are built for. Neither replaces a full enterprise repository if that's what you actually need, but if prioritization or traceability is the gap, they're worth a look.
Try Capability Modeler free for 30 days →